A rules‐based model for the analysis and evaluation of organizational communication
- 1 January 1979
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Communication Quarterly
- Vol. 27 (1) , 12-28
- https://doi.org/10.1080/01463377909369320
Abstract
This paper combines an interactionist perspective with a rules‐based approach for the purpose of analyzing and evaluating organizations. It is suggested that an organization is analogous to a culture and that it can be analyzed by identifying its collectively defined master contract. It may be critiqued by assessing the process by which that master contract is communicated among its members. The organization and its individual members can then be evaluated according to the competence with which members can coorient themselves to the master contract and can coordinate their activities within the constitutive and regulative rules established by the organization. A case study suggests this new approach to organizational communication will be a useful one for communication theory as well as for consultants.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES FOR THE COMMUNICATION THEORIST: PROBLEMS IN THE LAWS-RULES-SYSTEMS TRICHOTOMYHuman Communication Research, 1978
- GENERALITY AND NECESSITY IN THREE TYPES OF THEORY ABOUT HUMAN COMMUNICATION, WITH SPECIAL ATTENTION TO RULES THEORYHuman Communication Research, 1977
- Aligning ActionsAmerican Sociological Review, 1976
- Perceived dimensions of interpersonal relations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976
- The Principles of Scientific ThinkingPublished by Springer Nature ,1970
- Mixed-Scanning: A "Third" Approach to Decision-MakingPublic Administration Review, 1967
- Personal constructs, rules, and the logic of clinical activity.Psychological Review, 1964
- ImagePublished by University of Michigan Library ,1956
- I. DEONTIC LOGICMind, 1951
- The Functional Autonomy of MotivesThe American Journal of Psychology, 1937