Power and Efficiency as Indexes of Fitness in Metabolic Organization
- 1 May 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by University of Chicago Press in The American Naturalist
- Vol. 127 (5) , 629-653
- https://doi.org/10.1086/284510
Abstract
Bioenergetics, the study of energy flow through organisms, is a useful context for the evolutionary studies of metabolic organization. The far-from-equilibrium nature of living systems requires criteria of metabolic function not drawn from inappropriate equilibrium-machine analogies. Energy processing by organisms is divided into the production of metabolic "currencies" from food input (i.e., metabolic processing) and the allocation of such currency to fitness-related activities. A careful analysis of the nature of, and connections among, these processes can identify character states in metabolism, which are distinguishable by natural selection. An analysis of mechanisms affecting metabolic processing power (rate of production of currency) and efficiency (currency produced per unit input) shows that, although selection can act on each of these measures independently, these measures will often covary positively, since they are both promoted by the same kinetic adjustments. Previous claims of a forced trade-off between metabolic power and efficiency, as analyzed here, have failed to separate thermodynamic constraint from adaptive kinetic options, or have misapplied equilibrium or near-equilibrium reasoning to far-from-equilibrium situations. Metabolic power and efficiency relate to fitness increases via the biochemical mechanisms of energy-currency allocation to fitness-related uses. The power and the efficiency of allocation may or may not differ in nature from the power and the efficiency of metabolic processing, but may also covary positively. All four of these measures are thus effective indexes of fitness. A clarification of the distinct, but often covarying, roles of power and efficiency as metabolic-level fitness indexes potentiates the development of an evolutionary theory of metabolic organization. Such a theory may provide the essential connecting links between foraging theory and life-history-strategy theory, may provide and effective context for evolutionary study of natural genetic variation, and may yield effective insight into the interactions among adapative change, mechanistic constraint, and historical constraint in the evolution of energy-flow patterns in living systems.This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Graded allocation between vegetative and reproductive growth for annual plants in growing seasons of random lengthTheoretical Population Biology, 1982
- Evidence for biochemical and physiological differences between enzyme genotypes in Drosophila melanogaster.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1981
- Nutritional and Life-History Determinants of Resource Allocation in Holometabolous InsectsThe American Naturalist, 1981
- Metabolic resource allocation vs. mating attractiveness: Adaptive pressures on the “alba” polymorphism of Colias butterfliesProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1980
- Molecular Democracy: Who Shares the Controls?Biochemical Society Transactions, 1979
- Environmental Uncertainty and Evolution of Physiological Adaptation in Colias ButterfliesThe American Naturalist, 1978
- The Pollination Ecology of Aquilegia Elegantula and A. Caerulea (Ranunculaceae) in ColoradoAmerican Journal of Botany, 1978
- ADAPTATION AT SPECIFIC LOCI. I. NATURAL SELECTION ON PHOSPHOGLUCOSE ISOMERASE OF COLIAS BUTTERFLIES: BIOCHEMICAL AND POPULATION ASPECTSGenetics, 1977
- Optimal Foraging: A Selective Review of Theory and TestsThe Quarterly Review of Biology, 1977
- The Relationships between Substrates and Enzymes of Glycolysis in BrainJournal of Biological Chemistry, 1964