Appropriate use of local anaesthetic for venous cannulation
- 1 March 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Anaesthesia
- Vol. 47 (3) , 210-212
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1992.tb02120.x
Abstract
A departmental survey indicated that the large majority of anaesthetists believed that injection of local anaesthetic before insertion of an intravenous cannula was unnecessary if a cannula of 18 gauge or smaller was used, because injection of local anaesthetic would be more painful than insertion of the cannula. A study was undertaken to test this hypothesis. The results showed that intravenous cannulation with a cannula of 18, 20 or 22 gauge was significantly (p less than 0.006) more painful than a subcutaneous injection of 1% lignocaine. We recommend that subcutaneous injection of local anaesthetic should be considered before insertion of any size of intravenous cannula.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ethyl chloride and venepuncture pain: a comparison with intradermal lidocaineCanadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, 1990
- DEPTH AND DURATION OF SKIN ANALGESIA TO NEEDLE INSERTION AFTER TOPICAL APPLICATION OF EMLA CREAMBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1990
- EDITORIAL IIBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1989
- DOUBLE-BLIND EVALUATION OF A LIGNOCAINE-PRILOCAINE CREAM (EMLA) IN CHILDRENBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1986