Automated Peritoneal Dialysis Symposium: Determinants in APD Selection
- 1 November 2002
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Seminars in Dialysis
- Vol. 15 (6) , 388-392
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-139x.2002.00097.x
Abstract
Automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) is the most prevalent form of peritoneal dialysis in the United States. Optimizing the success of this treatment requires appropriate patient selection; however, there are few data available on which patients are most likely to benefit the most from this form of therapy. The key factors to evaluate when APD is being considered include patient preferences and lifestyle, patient age, solute transport characteristics, residual renal function (RRF), cost, dialysis adequacy targets, and the potential for complications of therapy. Patients who prefer home dialysis at night, children, those with high average or high peritoneal transport characteristics, and those with significant RRF are ideal candidates for APD. Because of the flexibility that is possible in prescribing this form of dialysis, APD can be successfully performed in individuals who do not meet this ideal profile, and it can be an excellent form of dialysis, particularly as part of an integrated care program for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD).Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- HomeChoice Automated Peritoneal Dialysis Machines: The Impact of Reuse of Tubing and CassettesPeritoneal Dialysis International, 2000
- Automated Peritoneal Dialysis: Clinical Prescription and TechnologyPeritoneal Dialysis International, 2000
- A Prospective, Randomized Multicenter Study Comparing APD and CAPD TreatmentPeritoneal Dialysis International, 1999
- Small and Middle Molecular Weight Solute Clearance in Nocturnal Intermittent Peritoneal DialysisPeritoneal Dialysis International, 1999
- The influence of automated peritoneal dialysis on the decrease in residual renal functionNephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 1999
- Cycler adequacy and prescription data in a national cohort sample: The 1997 core indicators reportKidney International, 1999
- Advantages and Disadvantages of Automated Peritoneal Dialysis Compared to Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal DialysisPeritoneal Dialysis International, 1999
- Automated Peritoneal Dialysis as a Means to Maintain a Peritoneal Dialysis ProgramPublished by S. Karger AG ,1999
- Automated peritoneal dialysisPublished by Springer Nature ,1994
- Differences between CAPD and CCPD: Implications for TherapySeminars in Dialysis, 1993