Neo‐Classical Neo‐Populism 25 Years On: Déjà Vu and Déjà Passé. Towards a Critique
- 19 December 2003
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Agrarian Change
- Vol. 4 (1-2) , 17-44
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0366.2004.00071.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Poverty and the Distribution of LandJournal of Agrarian Change, 2002
- A Pro‐Poor Development Project in Rural Pakistan: An Academic Analysis and a Non‐InterventionJournal of Agrarian Change, 2002
- Making Negotiated Land Reform Work: Initial Experience from Colombia, Brazil and South AfricaWorld Development, 1999
- Output per acre and size of holding: The logic of peasant agriculture under semi‐feudalismThe Journal of Peasant Studies, 1996
- Dynamic economies and the critique of urban biasThe Journal of Peasant Studies, 1996
- Farm size ‐ farm productivity re‐examined: Evidence from rural EgyptThe Journal of Peasant Studies, 1991
- Charan Singh, 1902–87: An assessmentThe Journal of Peasant Studies, 1988
- Neo‐populism and Marxism: The Chayanovian view of the agrarian question and its fundamental fallacyThe Journal of Peasant Studies, 1979
- Of neo‐populist pipe‐dreams: Daedalus in the Third World and the myth of urban biasThe Journal of Peasant Studies, 1979
- CLASS STRUGGLE AND THE DISTRIBUTION OF NATIONAL INCOMEKyklos, 1971