Conversion to monotherapy
- 10 June 2003
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Neurology
- Vol. 60 (11_suppl_4) , S13-S25
- https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.60.11_suppl_4.s13
Abstract
The efficacy, tolerability, and safety of a potential antiepileptic drug (AED) are initially evaluated in clinical trials employing add-on designs. When positive, those trials allow us only to conclude that the study drug is efficacious when administered as adjunctive therapy. However, to demonstrate efficacy and safety as monotherapy, the drug must be evaluated using a monotherapy trial design. Such a design needs to take into account important methodologic issues that can affect clinical relevance and/or raise ethical concerns. This review critically assesses two monotherapy trial designs: outpatient conversion to monotherapy and presurgical conversion to monotherapy in patients with medically refractory seizures of partial onset. The efficacy and safety data derived from published studies of AED monotherapy in patients with partial-onset seizures that utilize these trial designs are evaluated and the advantages and disadvantages of each trial design are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Monotherapy Trials of New Antiepileptic DrugsEpilepsia, 1997
- Topiramate Monotherapy for Partial Onset SeizuresEpilepsia, 1997
- What Trials, Which Designs?Epilepsia, 1997
- Felbamate Monotherapy: Implications for Antiepileptic Drug DevelopmentEpilepsia, 1995
- Efficacy of felbamate monotherapy in patients undergoing presurgical evaluation of partial seizuresEpilepsy Research, 1995
- Messages of SupportEpilepsia, 1995
- The Continuing Unethical Use of Placebo ControlsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994
- Felbamate monotherapy: Controlled trial in patients with partial onset seizuresAnnals of Neurology, 1992
- Clinical trial design for antiepileptic drugsAnnals of Neurology, 1992
- Clinical Trials of Investigational Antiepileptic Drugs: Monotherapy DesignsEpilepsia, 1991