The demonstration of a change in adrenergic receptor sensitivity in the central nervous system of mice after withdrawal from long-term treatment with haloperidol
- 1 January 1976
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Psychopharmacology
- Vol. 48 (1) , 105-114
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00423315
Abstract
Mice, administered haloperiodl (3 mg/kg/d) in their drinking water for 21 days, displayed, 4 days after cessation of the haloperidol-treatment, marked locomotor stimulation to clonidine (100 or 500 μg/kg) which lasted for about 6 h. 25 μg clonidine/kg was inactive. Premedication with FLA-63 (25 mg/kg) blocked the difference in stimulation after clonidine between the haloperidol- and vehicle-treated animals, but locomotor activity was still present in both groups. Haloperidol-treated animals displayed a supersensitive response to dexamphetamine. The difference in stimulation produced by dexamphetamine in the two groups was completely blocked by phenoxybenzamine (2.5 mg/kg), phentolamine (10 mg/kg), which drugs did not, however, block the locomotor stimulation produced by dexamphetamine in vehicle-treated animals. Pimozide (3 mg/kg) blocked all locomotor stimulation produced by dexamphetamine in both vehicle- and haloperidol-treated groups, while 1 mg/kg completely blocked the dexamphetamine response in vehicle-treated animals but not in haloperidol-treated animals. FLA-63 (25 mg/kg) blocked the difference in response between the haloperidol- and vehicletreated groups to dexamphetamine, but did not antagonise the stimulation in the vehicle-treated animals. The data suggest that long-term haloperidol treatment leads to the development of “supersensitive” adrenergic receptors in the central nervous system, which, appropriately stimulated, effect an increase in locomotor activity. Moreover, the results indicate that a large component of the supersensitive response to dexamphetamine observed after long-term haloperidol-treatment is due to adrenergic receptor supersensitivity. However, the dopamine receptor (which was shown to be supersensitive to apomorphine) is of fundamental importance because phenoxybenzamine and phenolamine, while blocking the supersensitive response to dexamphetamine, failed to block the response to dexamphetamine in vehicletreated animals, which was, however, blocked by pimozide.This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Behavioural supersensitivity to apomorphine following chronic treatment with drugs which interfere with the synaptic function of catecholaminesNeuropharmacology, 1974
- Behavioral evidence for dopaminergic supersensitivity after chronic haloperidolLife Sciences, 1974
- Turning behavior of mice with unilateral 6-hydroxydopamine lesions in the striatum: Effects of apomorphine, l-DOPA, amantadine, amphetamine and other psychomotor stimulantsNeuropharmacology, 1973
- An experimental model of tardive dyskinesiaJournal Of Neural Transmission-Parkinsons Disease and Dementia Section, 1972
- The effect of clonidine on locomotor activity in miceLife Sciences, 1972
- Functional and biochemical effects of d- and l-amphetamine on central catecholamine neuronsNaunyn-Schmiedebergs Archiv für experimentelle Pathologie und Pharmakologie, 1971
- Evidence for a central noradrenaline receptor stimulation by clonidineLife Sciences, 1970
- Evidence for dopamine receptor stimulation by apomorphineJournal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 1967
- Adrenergic Effect of Chronic Administration of NeurolepticsNature, 1967
- Effect of Chlorpromazine or Haloperidol on Formation of 3‐Methoxytyramine and Normetanephrine in Mouse BrainActa Pharmacologica et Toxicologica, 1963