Robustness of the T Test: A Guide for Researchers on Effect of Violations of Assumptions
- 1 June 1974
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Psychological Reports
- Vol. 34 (3_suppl) , 1095-1114
- https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1974.34.3c.1095
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine empirically the effects of quantified violations of assumptions underlying the t test. Using computer simulations, the effects of heterogeneity of variance, non-normality, and nonlinear transformations of scales were studied separately and in all combinations. Monte Carlo procedures were used to generate populations of scores for which distributions were normal, positively skewed, negatively skewed, and leptokurtic. Samples of varying sizes were then randomly selected from specific populations and t tests were run to identify where discrepancies between obtained and expected t distributions would occur. Results indicated that certain violations or combinations produce little distortion in resulting t distributions while other violations produce significant discrepancies. Specific guidelines and reference tables were developed to assist the researcher in assessing the severity of certain violations or degrees of violation.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Consequences of Failure to Meet Assumptions Underlying the Fixed Effects Analyses of Variance and CovarianceReview of Educational Research, 1972
- Weak Measurements vs. Strong Statistics: An Empirical Critique of S. S. Stevens' Proscriptions nn StatisticsEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1966
- Scales and statistics: Parametric and nonparametric.Psychological Bulletin, 1961
- The effects of violations of assumptions underlying the t test.Psychological Bulletin, 1960
- Introduction to Statistical Analysis.Biometrika, 1957
- On the Statistical Treatment of Football Numbers.American Psychologist, 1953
- Additive scales and statistics.Psychological Review, 1953
- The Assumptions Underlying the Analysis of VarianceBiometrics, 1947
- Some Consequences When the Assumptions for the Analysis of Variance are not SatisfiedBiometrics, 1947
- THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN TWO MEANS WHEN THE POPULATION VARIANCES ARE UNEQUALBiometrika, 1938