ELISA versus routine tests in the diagnosis of patients with systemic and neurobrucellosis

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Sera from patients in different stages of brucellosis as well as sera and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from patients with central nervous system (CNS) brucellosis and controls, were tested by ELISA for Brucella‐specific IgG, IgM and IgA. The results were compared with culture findings, micro‐agglutination (MA), slide agglutination with Rose Bengal (RB), and Brucella melitensis stained antigens (SA). In sera of patients with acute brucellosis (296), ELISA was positive for IgM (100%), IgG (97%) and IgA (98%), and comparable results were found in sera of patients with subacute brucellosis (44): IgG (100%), IgM (86%) and IgA (100%). However, in patients with chronic brucellosis (40), IgG and IgA were consistently positive (100%) while IgM was only positive in 33% of their sera. The MA and RB showed similar results, being more positive in patients with acute (98%) and subacute (84%) than in chronic (61%) brucellosis. The SA and culture showed significantly lower positive results. In the CSF of patients with CNS brucellosis (45), ELISA was positive in 100%, 20% and 85% for IgG, IgM and IgA, respectively, compared to 13% positive by culture, 25% by MA and 22% by RB. ELISA was negative in the CSF specimens from patients with brucellosis without CNS involvement (66), or meningitis other than Brucella (62), and no meningitis (144). Thus, ELISA with its IgG, IgM and IgA profiles is the test of choice in the diagnosis of patients with brucellosis, especially those with chronic or CNS infection.