Drought-inhibition of Photosynthesis in C3 Plants: Stomatal and Non-stomatal Limitations Revisited
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 1 February 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Annals of Botany
- Vol. 89 (2) , 183-189
- https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcf027
Abstract
There is a long‐standing controversy as to whether drought limits photosynthetic CO2 assimilation through stomatal closure or by metabolic impairment in C3 plants. Comparing results from different studies is difficult due to interspecific differences in the response of photosynthesis to leaf water potential and/or relative water content (RWC), the most commonly used parameters to assess the severity of drought. Therefore, we have used stomatal conductance (g) as a basis for comparison of metabolic processes in different studies. The logic is that, as there is a strong link between g and photosynthesis (perhaps co‐regulation between them), so different relationships between RWC or water potential and photosynthetic rate and changes in metabolism in different species and studies may be ‘normalized’ by relating them to g. Re‐analysing data from the literature using light‐saturated g as a parameter indicative of water deficits in plants shows that there is good correspondence between the onset of drought‐induced inhibition of different photosynthetic sub‐processes and g. Contents of ribulose bisphosphate (RuBP) and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) decrease early in drought development, at still relatively high g (higher than 150 mmol H2O m–2 s–1). This suggests that RuBP regeneration and ATP synthesis are impaired. Decreased photochemistry and Rubisco activity typically occur at lower g (2O m–2 s–1), whereas permanent photoinhibition is only occasional, occurring at very low g (2O m–2 s–1). Sub‐stomatal CO2 concentration decreases as g becomes smaller, but increases again at small g. The analysis suggests that stomatal closure is the earliest response to drought and the dominant limitation to photosynthesis at mild to moderate drought. However, in parallel, progressive down‐regulation or inhibition of metabolic processes leads to decreased RuBP content, which becomes the dominant limitation at severe drought, and thereby inhibits photosynthetic CO2 assimilation.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Analysis of the Relative Increase in Photosynthetic O2 Uptake When Photosynthesis in Grapevine Leaves Is Inhibited following Low Night Temperatures and/or Water StressPlant Physiology, 1999
- Photosynthesis of oak leaves under water stress: maintenance of high photochemical efficiency of photosystem II and occurrence of non-uniform CO2 assimilationTree Physiology, 1993
- Effects of Water-Deficit Stress on Photosynthesis, Its Components and Component Limitations, and on Water Use Efficiency in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Plant Physiology, 1992
- ATPase state and activity in thylakoids from normal and waterstressed lupinFEBS Letters, 1992
- Regulation of Photosynthetic Rate of Two Sunflower Hybrids under Water StressPlant Physiology, 1992
- Photophosphorylation in Attached Leaves of Helianthus annuus at Low Water PotentialsPlant Physiology, 1991
- Mild Water Stress Effects on Carbon-Reduction-Cycle Intermediates, Ribulose Bisphosphate Carboxylase Activity, and Spatial Homogeneity of Photosynthesis in Intact LeavesPlant Physiology, 1989
- Water Deficit and Associated Changes in Some Photosynthetic Parameters in Leaves of `Valencia' Orange (Citrus sinensis [L.] Osbeck)Plant Physiology, 1988
- Leaf Photosynthesis and Conductance of Selected Triticum Species at Different Water PotentialsPlant Physiology, 1987
- Conformation and activity of chloroplast coupling factor exposed to low chemical potential of water in cellsBiochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Bioenergetics, 1979