Bioelectrical impedance analysis for body composition: clinical evaluation in general surgical patients
- 1 March 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
- Vol. 14 (2) , 129-133
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0148607190014002129
Abstract
Body composition was measured in 112 surgical patients and eight normal subjects by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), and the results compared with our standard five‐compartment method utilizing in vivo neutron activation analysis and tritium dilution space to measure fat‐free mass and total body water. In a population with a mean fat‐free mass of 49.2 kg by the latter method, BIA underestimated fat‐free mass by 1.3 kg, with a standard deviation (SD) of 4.0 kg. Total body water was overestimated by 0.5 liter, with SD of 0.47 liter, when compared to a mean tritium dilution space of 36.7 liter. Changes in total body water which occurred over a treatment period of at least 1 week were also measured by the two methods. The change as measured by isotopic dilution could be estimated from the change as measured by BIA with a standard error of 2.25 liter. Although the results suggest that BIA should not be used as a research tool, it is concluded that in clinical practice, when nutrient requirements are being estimated, fat‐free mass measured by BIA may have a useful place.This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Measurement of body fat and hydration of the fat-free body in health and diseaseMetabolism, 1985
- Estimation of human body composition by electrical impedance methods: a comparative studyJournal of Applied Physiology, 1985
- Assessment of fat-free mass using bioelectrical impedance measurements of the human bodyThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1985
- Evaluation of an in vivo prompt gamma neutron activation facility for body composition studies in critically ill intensive care patients: Results on 41 normalsMetabolism, 1984
- BODY CELL MASS AND LIMITS OF HYDRATION OF THE FAT‐FREE BODY: THEIR RELATION TO ESTIMATED SKELETAL WEIGHT*Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1963