Reminder: Reliability of Global Judgments
- 1 February 1981
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Perceptual and Motor Skills
- Vol. 52 (1) , 315-318
- https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1981.52.1.315
Abstract
Reliability as measured by the extent of agreement is often a problem for complex global judgments. Empirically, the use of multiple raters improved reliability consistent with predictions from the Spearman-Brown formula. Implications for the reliability of clinical diagnosis are suggested.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- The stability of behavior: II. Implications for psychological research.American Psychologist, 1980
- Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.Psychological Bulletin, 1979
- THE RELATIONSHIP OF RELIABILITY IN CLASSROOM RESEARCH TO THE AMOUNT OF OBSERVATION: AN EXTENSION OF THE SPEARMAN‐BROWN FORMULAJournal of Educational Measurement, 1978
- Part II. Measuring Premorbid Adjustment: The Instruments and Their Development*Schizophrenia Bulletin, 1977
- Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit.Psychological Bulletin, 1968
- Quantification of Agreement in Psychiatric DiagnosisArchives of General Psychiatry, 1967
- Theory of mental tests.Published by American Psychological Association (APA) ,1950