Effects of the Beach Chair Position, Positive End-expiratory Pressure, and Pneumoperitoneum on Respiratory Function in Morbidly Obese Patients during Anesthesia and Paralysis
- 1 November 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Anesthesiology
- Vol. 107 (5) , 725-732
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.anes.0000287026.61782.a6
Abstract
Background: The authors studied the effects of the beach chair (BC) position, 10 cm H2O positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), and pneumoperitoneum on respiratory function in morbidly obese patients undergoing laparoscopic gastric banding. Methods: The authors studied 20 patients (body mass index 42 +/- 5 kg/m2) during the supine and BC positions, before and after pneumoperitoneum was instituted (13.6 +/- 1.2 mmHg). PEEP was applied during each combination of position and pneumoperitoneum. The authors measured elastance (E,rs) of the respiratory system, end-expiratory lung volume (helium technique), and arterial oxygen tension. Pressure-volume curves were also taken (occlusion technique). Patients were paralyzed during total intravenous anesthesia. Tidal volume (10.5 +/- 1 ml/kg ideal body weight) and respiratory rate (11 +/- 1 breaths/min) were kept constant throughout. Results: In the supine position, respiratory function was abnormal: E,rs was 21.71 +/- 5.26 cm H2O/l, and end-expiratory lung volume was 0.46 +/- 0.1 l. Both the BC position and PEEP improved E,rs (P < 0.01). End-expiratory lung volume almost doubled (0.83 +/- 0.3 and 0.85 +/- 0.3 l, BC and PEEP, respectively; P < 0.01 vs. supine zero end-expiratory pressure), with no evidence of lung recruitment (0.04 +/- 0.1 l in the supine and 0.07 +/- 0.2 in the BC position). PEEP was associated with higher airway pressures than the BC position (22.1 +/- 2.01 vs. 13.8 +/- 1.8 cm H2O; P < 0.01). Pneumoperitoneum further worsened E,rs (31.59 +/- 6.73; P < 0.01) and end-expiratory lung volume (0.35 +/- 0.1 l; P < 0.01). Changes of lung volume correlated with changes of oxygenation (linear regression, R2 = 0.524, P < 0.001) so that during pneumoperitoneum, only the combination of the BC position and PEEP improved oxygenation. Conclusions: The BC position and PEEP counteracted the major derangements of respiratory function produced by anesthesia and paralysis. During pneumoperitoneum, only the combination of the two maneuvers improved oxygenation.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Effects of Tidal Volume and Respiratory Rate on Oxygenation and Respiratory Mechanics During Laparoscopy in Morbidly Obese PatientsAnesthesia & Analgesia, 2003
- The Effects of the Reverse Trendelenburg Position on Respiratory Mechanics and Blood Gases in Morbidly Obese Patients During Bariatric SurgeryAnesthesia & Analgesia, 2000
- Effects of pneumoperitoneum and reverse Trendelenburg position on cardiopulmonary function in morbidly obese patients receiving laparoscopic gastric bandingEuropean Journal of Anaesthesiology, 2000
- Changes in pulmonary mechanics during laparoscopic gastroplasty in morbidly obese patientsActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 1997
- PERIOPERATIVE CHANGES IN FUNCTIONAL RESIDUAL CAPACITY IN MORBIDLY OBESE PATIENTSBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1988
- Respiratory Complications of ObesityChest, 1980
- Effects of Ventilation with Large Tidal Volumes or Positive End-Expiratory Pressure on Cardiorespiratory Function in Anesthetized Obese PatientsActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 1978
- Breathing Mechanics, Dead Space and Gas Exchange in the Extremely Obese, Breathing Spontaneously and During Anaesthesia with Intermittent Positive Pressure VentilationActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 1976
- Respiratory Compliance in Obese PatientsAnesthesiology, 1974
- Effects of mass loading the respiratory system in manJournal of Applied Physiology, 1964