The use of macrolides in treatment of upper respiratory tract infections
- 1 June 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Current Infectious Disease Reports
- Vol. 7 (3) , 175-184
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s11908-005-0031-z
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance is a growing problem among upper respiratory tract pathogens. Resistance to β-lactam drugs among Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Streptococcus pyogenes is increasing. As safe and well-tolerated antibiotics, macrolides play a key role in the treatment of community-acquired upper respiratory tract infections (RTIs). Their broad spectrum of activity against gram-positive cocci, such as S. pneumoniae and S. pyogenes, atypical pathogens, H. influenzae (azithromycin and clarithromycin), and Moraxella catarrhalis, has led to the widespread use of macrolides for empiric treatment of upper RTIs and as alternatives for patients allergic to β-lactams. Macrolide resistance is increasing among pneumococci and recently among S. pyogenes, and is associated with increasing use of the newer macrolides, such as azithromycin. Ribosomal target modification mediated by erm(A) [erm(TR)] and erm(B) genes and active efflux due to mef(A) and mef(E) are the principal mechanisms of resistance in S. pneumoniae and S. pyogenes. Recently, ribosomal protein and RNA mutations have been found responsible for acquired resistance to macrolides in S. pneumoniae, S. pyogenes, and H. influenzae. Although macrolides are only weakly active against macrolide-resistant streptococci species producing an efflux pump (mef) and are inactive against pathogens with ribosomal target modification (erm), treatment failures are uncommon. Therefore, macrolide therapy, for now, remains a good alternative for treatment of upper RTIs; however, continuous monitoring of the local resistance patterns is essential.Keywords
This publication has 59 references indexed in Scilit:
- Review of Macrolides and KetolidesDrugs, 2001
- The Complete Atomic Structure of the Large Ribosomal Subunit at 2.4 Å ResolutionScience, 2000
- Multicenter, randomized, double-blind comparison of erythromycin estolate versus amoxicillin for the treatment of acute otitis media in childrenEuropean Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 1998
- Azithromycin versus cefaclor in the treatment of pediatric patients with acute group a beta-hemolytic streptococcal tonsillopharyngitisEuropean Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 1998
- Azithromycin versus penicillin V in the treatment of paediatric patients with acute streptococcal pharyngitis/tonsillitisEuropean Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 1996
- Five days of erythromycin estolate versus ten days of penicillin V in the treatment of group a streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis in childrenEuropean Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 1996
- A multicenter, double blind comparison of azithromycin and amoxicillin/clavulanate for the treatment of acute otitis media in childrenThe Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, 1996
- A multicenter, open label trial of azithromycin vs. amoxicillin/clavulanate for the management of acute otitis media in childrenThe Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, 1996
- Multicentre comparative study of the efficacy and safety of azithromycin compared with amoxicillin/clavulanic acid in the treatment of paediatric patients with otitis mediaEuropean Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 1995
- An open-label, noncomparative study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of azithromycin in the treatment of patients with acute sinusitisClinical Therapeutics, 1995