COMPARISON OF FLICKER PERIMETRY AND STANDARD VISUAL FIELDS IN BRAIN-DAMAGED PATIENTS1
- 29 January 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Hindawi Limited in Acta Neurologica Scandinavica
- Vol. 42 (2) , 207-212
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0404.1966.tb01176.x
Abstract
A quantitative method for identifying visual impairment associated with brain-damage, based on plotting visual fields by means of thresholds for a flickering light, has been developed. Comparison was made of inferences independently derived from the above method and from standard visual fields in 50 brain-damaged patients as regards the questions: abnormal or normal visual fields and if abnormal, central or peripheral? The flicker perimetry index indicated 82% of the patients had abnormal visual fields; 80% were judged as centrally determined. A Board Ophthalmologist interpreting the standard visual fields declared 50% to have abnormal fields and 16% to be centrally determined. Both sets of statements were made independently of the case history.This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Identification of Brain Damage by Flicker Perimetry: A Second Cross-ValidationPerceptual and Motor Skills, 1964
- Ability to distinguish two cutaneous stimuli separated by a brief time intervalNeurology, 1961
- Visual Field Impairment in Brain DamageA.M.A. Archives of Ophthalmology, 1960
- Impairment of flicker discrimination in brain‐damaged patientsNeurology, 1958
- Temporal acuity of vision, audition, and touch in psychogenic and neurogenic pathology.Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1955
- COMPARISON OF FLICKER PERIMETRY WITH STANDARD PERIMETRIC METHODSArchives of Ophthalmology (1950), 1954
- TESTING VISUAL FIELDS BY FLICKER FUSIONArchives of Neurology & Psychiatry, 1951