Evidence-based red cell transfusion in the critically ill: Quality improvement using computerized physician order entry*
- 1 July 2006
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Critical Care Medicine
- Vol. 34 (7) , 1892-1897
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccm.0000220766.13623.fe
Abstract
The implementation of evidence-based practice poses a significant challenge in the intensive care unit. In this quality improvement intervention we assessed the effect of an institutional protocol and computerized decision support for red cell transfusion in the critically ill. We compared processes of care and outcomes during the two 3-month periods before and after the introduction of a multidisciplinary quality improvement intervention. Multidisciplinary intensive care units--medical, surgical, and mixed--in a tertiary academic center. Consecutive critically ill patients with anemia (hemoglobin of <10 g/dL). Using the computerized provider order entry, we developed an evidence-based decision algorithm for red cell transfusion in adult intensive care units. We collected information on demographics, diagnosis, severity of illness, transfusion complications, and laboratory values. The main outcome measures were number of transfusions, proportion of patients who were transfused outside evidence-based indications, transfusion complications, and adjusted hospital mortality. The mean number of red cell transfusions per intensive care unit admission decreased from 1.08 +/- 2.3 units before to 0.86 +/- 2.3 units after the protocol (p<.001). We observed a marked decrease in the percentage of patients receiving inappropriate transfusions (17.7% vs. 4.5%, p< .001). The rate of transfusion complications was also lower in the period after the protocol (6.1% vs. 2.7%, p = .015). In the multivariate analysis, protocol introduction was associated with decreased likelihood of red cell transfusion (odds ratio, 0.43; 95% confidence interval, 0.30 to 0.62). Adjusted hospital mortality did not differ before and after protocol implementation (odds ratio, 1.12; 95% confidence interval, 0.69 to 1.8). The implementation of an institutional protocol and decision support through a computerized provider order entry effectively decreased inappropriate red cell transfusions.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effects of Computerized Clinical Decision Support Systems on Practitioner Performance and Patient OutcomesJAMA, 2005
- Evaluating the Performance of an Institution Using an Intensive Care Unit BenchmarkMayo Clinic Proceedings, 2005
- Computerized physician order entry in the critical care and general inpatient setting: A narrative reviewJournal of Critical Care, 2004
- Red cell requirements for intensive care units adhering to evidence‐based transfusion guidelinesTransfusion, 2004
- Effect of a flow chart on use of blood transfusions in primary total hip and knee replacement: prospective before and after studyBMJ, 2004
- The CRIT Study: Anemia and blood transfusion in the critically ill—Current clinical practice in the United States*Critical Care Medicine, 2004
- Risks of blood transfusionCritical Care Medicine, 2003
- Early Goal-Directed Therapy in the Treatment of Severe Sepsis and Septic ShockNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Ventilation with Lower Tidal Volumes as Compared with Traditional Tidal Volumes for Acute Lung Injury and the Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeNew England Journal of Medicine, 2000
- A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial of Transfusion Requirements in Critical CareNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999