A comparison of astemizole and chlorpheniramine in dermographic urticaria
- 1 April 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in British Journal of Dermatology
- Vol. 112 (4) , 447-453
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.1985.tb02319.x
Abstract
The effects of the HI receptor antagonists astemizole and chlorpheniramine on dermographism were coated in a double-blind study in 16 patients. Both drugs resulted in a parallel and significant depression of the dermographic force-response curve and an elevation of the weal-force threshold, but the changes were greater in the patients receiving astemizole (a maximal potency shift of 74% for astemizole and 37% for chlorpheniramine). Subjective itch (10 cm line) and frequency of dermographic episodes were also reduced more by astemizole than by chlorpheniramine. The effect of astemizole was greater at 4 wk than at 2 wk, whereas the effect of chlorpheniramine had decreased at 4 wk. The effect of astemizole but not chlorpheniramine was still apparent 4 wk after treatment was stopped. Since the degree of residual dermographism was comparable despite great differences in histamine weal inhibition a vasoactive mechanism in addition to that mediated by histamine must be involved in the dermographic urticaria.This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- The effect of terfenadine on dermographic wealingBritish Journal of Dermatology, 1984
- Performance studies with the H1-histamine receptor antagonists, astemizole and terfenadine.Published by Wiley ,1982
- INVITRO AND INVIVO BINDING CHARACTERISTICS OF A NEW LONG-ACTING HISTAMINE H-1 ANTAGONIST, ASTEMIZOLE1982