Ligand Competition Curves as a Diagnostic Tool for Delineating the Nature of Site‐Site Interactions: Theory
Open Access
- 1 December 1979
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in European Journal of Biochemistry
- Vol. 102 (2) , 449-466
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-1033.1979.tb04260.x
Abstract
A few molecular models have been developed in recent years to explain the mechanism of cooperative ligand binding. The concerted model of Monod, Wyman and Changeux and the sequential model of Koshland, Némethy and Filmer were formulated to account for positively cooperative binding. The pre‐existent asymmetry model and the sequential model can account for negatively cooperative ligand binding. In most cases, however, it is virtually impossible to deduce the molecular mechanism of ligand binding solely from the shape of the binding isotherm. In the present study we suggest a new strategy for delineating the molecular mechanism responsible for cooperative ligand binding from binding isotherms. In this approach one examines the effect of one ligand on the cooperativity observed in the binding of another ligand, where the two ligands compete for the same set of binding sites. It is demonstrated that the cooperativity of ligand binding can be modulated when a competitive ligdnd is present in the protein‐ligand binding mixture. A general mathematical formulation of this modulation is presented in thermodynamic terms, using model‐ independent parameters. The relation between the Hill coefficient at 50% ligand saturation with respect to ligand X in the absence, h(x), and in the presence of a competing ligand Z, h(x,z), is expressed in terms of the thermodynamic parameters characterizing the binding of the two ligands. Then the relationship between h(x) and h(x,z), in terms of the molecular parameters of the different allosteric models, is explored. This analysis reveals that the different allosteric models predict different relationships between h(x,z) and h(x). These differences are especially focused when Z binds non‐cooperatively. Thus, it becomes possible, on the basis of ligand binding experiments alone, to decide which of the allosteric models best fits a set of experimental data.This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- [13] The meaning of scatchard and hill plotsPublished by Elsevier ,1978
- Cooperativity and noncooperativity in the binding of NAD analogs to rabbit muscle glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenaseBiochemistry, 1976
- Specificity of induced conformational changes. Case of yeast glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenaseBiochemistry, 1975
- Molecular basis of negative co-operativity in rabbit muscle glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenaseJournal of Molecular Biology, 1974
- Subunit Interactions in Enzyme CatalysisEuropean Journal of Biochemistry, 1974
- Half-Site ReactivitCRC Critical Reviews in Biochemistry, 1974
- Insulin interactions with its receptors: Experimental evidence for negative cooperativityBiochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 1973
- Negative cooperativity in enzyme action. Binding of diphosphopyridine nucleotide to glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenaseBiochemistry, 1968
- Comparison of Experimental Binding Data and Theoretical Models in Proteins Containing Subunits*Biochemistry, 1966
- On the nature of allosteric transitions: A plausible modelJournal of Molecular Biology, 1965