Population and colony structure of the carpenter ant Camponotus floridanus
- 1 December 1996
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Molecular Ecology
- Vol. 5 (6) , 785-792
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294x.1996.tb00374.x
Abstract
The colony and population structure of the carpenter ant, Camponotus floridanus, were investigated by multilocus DNA fingerprinting using simple repeat motifs as probes [e.g. (GATA)4]. The mating frequency of 15 queens was determined by comparing the fingerprint patterns of the queen and 17–33 of her progeny workers. C. floridanus queens are most probably singly mated, i.e. this species is monandrous and monogynous (one queen per colony). C. floridanus occurs in all counties of mainland Florida and also inhabits most of the Key islands in the southern part of Florida. We tested whether the two mainland populations and the island populations are genetically isolated. Wright's FST and Nei's D-value of genetic distance were calculated from intercolonial bandsharing-coefficients. The population of C. floridanus is substructured (FST= 0.19 ± 0.09) and the highest degree of genetic distance was found between one of the mainland populations and the island populations (D= 0.35). Our fingerprinting technique could successfully be transferred to 12 other Camponotus species and here also revealed sufficient variability to analyse the genetic structure. In three of these species (C. ligniperdus, C. herculeanus and C. gigas) we could determine the mating frequency of the queen in one or two colonies, respectively.Keywords
This publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- Expression of insulin pathway genes during the period of caste determination in the honey bee,Apis melliferaInsect Molecular Biology, 2006
- Geographical analysis of scorpion populations on habitat islandsHeredity, 1995
- Genetic variability affects the behavior of foragers in a feral honeybee colonyThe Science of Nature, 1995
- Genetic variability in the antCamponotus floridanus detected by multilocus DNA fingerprintingThe Science of Nature, 1994
- Individual-Level Selection, Colony-Level Selection, and the Association between Polygyny and Worker Monomorphism in AntsThe American Naturalist, 1992
- The evolution of queen‐rearing nepotism in social Hymenoptera: Effects of discrimination costs in swarming speciesJournal of Evolutionary Biology, 1991
- Kin selection and the problem of sperm utilization in social insectsNature, 1986
- Sperm Utilization in Social InsectsAnnual Review of Entomology, 1986
- The genetical evolution of social behaviour. IJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1964
- THE GENETICAL STRUCTURE OF POPULATIONSAnnals of Eugenics, 1949