Estimates of Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness for 2007–2008 From Canada's Sentinel Surveillance System: Cross-Protection Against Major and Minor Variants
Open Access
- 9 April 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The Journal of Infectious Diseases
- Vol. 205 (12) , 1858-1868
- https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jis283
Abstract
Objectives. To estimate influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE) for the 2007–2008 season and assess the sentinel surveillance system in Canada for monitoring virus evolution and impact on VE. Methods. Nasal/nasopharyngeal swabs and epidemiologic details were collected from patients presenting to a sentinel physician within 7 days of influenza-like illness onset. Cases tested positive for influenza A/B virus by real-time polymerase chain reaction; controls tested negative. Hemagglutination inhibition (HI) and gene sequencing explored virus relatedness to vaccine. VE was calculated as 1 minus the odds ratio for influenza in vaccinated versus nonvaccinated participants, with adjustment for confounders. Results. Of 1425 participants, 21% were vaccinated. Influenza virus was detected in 689 (48%), of which isolates from 663 were typed/subtyped: 189 (29%) were A/H1, 210 (32%) were A/H3, and 264 (40%) were B. Of A/H1N1 isolates, 6% showed minor HI antigenic mismatch to vaccine, with greater variation based on genetic identity. All A/H3N2 isolates showed moderate antigenic mismatch, and 98% of influenza B virus isolates showed major lineage-level mismatch to vaccine. Adjusted VE for A/H1N1, A/H3N2, and B components was 69% (95% confidence interval [CI], 44%–83%), 57% (95% CI, 32%–73%), and 55% (95% CI, 32%–70%), respectively, with an overall VE of 60% (95% CI, 45%–71%). Conclusions. Detailed antigenic and genotypic analysis of influenza viruses was consistent with epidemiologic estimates of VE showing cross-protection. A routine sentinel surveillance system that combines detailed virus and VE monitoring annually, as modeled in Canada, may guide improved vaccine selection and protection.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Serologic assays for influenza surveillance, diagnosis and vaccine evaluationExpert Review of Anti-infective Therapy, 2011
- Clinical Efficacy of Cell Culture–Derived and Egg‐Derived Inactivated Subunit Influenza Vaccines in Healthy AdultsClinical Infectious Diseases, 2010
- Association between the 2008–09 Seasonal Influenza Vaccine and Pandemic H1N1 Illness during Spring–Summer 2009: Four Observational Studies from CanadaPLoS Medicine, 2010
- Comparative Efficacy of Inactivated and Live Attenuated Influenza VaccinesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2009
- Genetic microheterogeneity of emerging H275Y influenza virus A (H1N1) in Toronto, Ontario, Canada from the 2007–2008 respiratory seasonJournal of Clinical Virology, 2009
- Component‐Specific Effectiveness of Trivalent Influenza Vaccine as Monitored through a Sentinel Surveillance Network in Canada, 2006–2007The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2009
- Effectiveness of Inactivated Influenza Vaccines Varied Substantially with Antigenic Match from the 2004–2005 Season to the 2006–2007 SeasonThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2009
- Estimating vaccine effectiveness against laboratory-confirmed influenza using a sentinel physician network: Results from the 2005–2006 season of dual A and B vaccine mismatch in CanadaVaccine, 2006
- The predicted antigenicity of the haemagglutinin of the 1918 Spanish influenza pandemic suggests an avian originPhilosophical Transactions Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2001
- The molecular epidemiology of influenza virusesSeminars in Virology, 1995