Error Review: Can This Improve Reporting Performance?
- 1 September 2001
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Clinical Radiology
- Vol. 56 (9) , 751-754
- https://doi.org/10.1053/crad.2001.0760
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reducing errors made by emergency physicians in interpreting radiographs: longitudinal studyBMJ, 2000
- A blind review and an informed review of interval breast cancer cases in the Limburg screening programme, the NetherlandsJournal of Medical Screening, 2000
- Is there an improvement in performance when radiographs are re-reported at 24 hours?The British Journal of Radiology, 1999
- Second round cancers: How many were visible on the first round of the UK national breast screening programme, three years earlier?Clinical Radiology, 1998
- Radiology's Achilles' heel: error and variation in the interpretation of the Röntgen image.The British Journal of Radiology, 1997
- Changing Physician PerformanceJAMA, 1995
- Evidence for the Effectiveness of CMEJAMA, 1992
- Error in radiology: classification and lessons in 182 cases presented at a problem case conference.Radiology, 1992
- Perception Errors in Chest RadiographySeminars in Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 1989
- Accuracy and Its Relationship to Experience in the Interpretation of Chest RadiographsInvestigative Radiology, 1975