Critical Evaluation of How the Rosgen Classification and Associated “Natural Channel Design” Methods Fail to Integrate and Quantify Fluvial Processes and Channel Response1
- 30 August 2007
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Jawra Journal of the American Water Resources Association
- Vol. 43 (5) , 1117-1131
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2007.00091.x
Abstract
Abstract: Over the past 10 years the Rosgen classification system and its associated methods of “natural channel design” have become synonymous to some with the term “stream restoration” and the science of fluvial geomorphology. Since the mid 1990s, this classification approach has become widely adopted by governmental agencies, particularly those funding restoration projects. The purposes of this article are to present a critical review, highlight inconsistencies and identify technical problems of Rosgen’s “natural channel design” approach to stream restoration. This paper’s primary thesis is that alluvial streams are open systems that adjust to altered inputs of energy and materials, and that a form‐based system largely ignores this critical component. Problems with the use of the classification are encountered with identifying bankfull dimensions, particularly in incising channels and with the mixing of bed and bank sediment into a single population. Its use for engineering design and restoration may be flawed by ignoring some processes governed by force and resistance, and the imbalance between sediment supply and transporting power in unstable systems. An example of how C5 channels composed of different bank sediments adjust differently and to different equilibrium morphologies in response to an identical disturbance is shown. This contradicts the fundamental underpinning of “natural channel design” and the “reference‐reach approach.” The Rosgen classification is probably best applied as a communication tool to describe channel form but, in combination with “natural channel design” techniques, are not diagnostic of how to mitigate channel instability or predict equilibrium morphologies. For this, physically based, mechanistic approaches that rely on quantifying the driving and resisting forces that control active processes and ultimate channel morphology are better suited as the physics of erosion, transport, and deposition are the same regardless of the hydro‐physiographic province or stream type because of the uniformity of physical laws.Keywords
This publication has 46 references indexed in Scilit:
- The River DoctorScience, 2004
- A classification of natural riversPublished by Elsevier ,2003
- Depositional response of a headwater stream to channelization, East Central Illinois, USARiver Research and Applications, 2003
- UNCERTAINTY IN ESTIMATING BANKFULL CONDITIONS1Jawra Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1996
- An examination of the Rosgen classification of natural riversCATENA, 1996
- Adjustment and recovery of unstable alluvial channels: Identification and approaches for engineering managementEarth Surface Processes and Landforms, 1995
- Geomorphological stream channel classification in aquatic habitat restoration: Uses and limitationsAquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 1995
- Tenerife's freshwater macroinvertebrates: Status and threats (Canary Islands, Spain)Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 1995
- Time, space, and causality in geomorphologyAmerican Journal of Science, 1965
- EDITORIAL COMMENTThe American Journal of Nursing, 1916