Interrater variability with the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and Functional Systems (FS) in a multiple sclerosis clinical trial
- 1 June 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Neurology
- Vol. 40 (6) , 971
- https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.40.6.971
Abstract
We describe the interrater variability in the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and Functional Systems (FS) in a multiple sclerosis clinical trial. Two physicians blinded to their previous assessments and to each other''s scores consecutively examined 168 patients (545 paired examinations). Perfect agreement on the assignment of the disability scores ranged from 48% (cerebellar functional group) to 69% (EDSS and pyramidal functional group). Only 31% to 62% of this agreement occurred independently of that expected by chance (kappa). With the exception of the cerebellar and sensory functional groups, agreement within 1 step occurred in at least 92% of cases. These findings suggest that differences of a single step of these scales may not reflect an important functional change. We recommend that at least a 2-step change (1.0 point on the EDSS and 2 points on the FS) is needed to be confident of an important change in the degree of disability or response to treatment in this disease.This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Interrater Reliability in Assessing Functional Systems and Disability on the Kurtzke Scale in Multiple SclerosisArchives of Neurology, 1988
- Cyclophosphamide in Chronic Progressive Multiple SclerosisArchives of Neurology, 1987
- EFFECT OF TOTAL LYMPHOID IRRADIATION IN CHRONIC PROGRESSIVE MULTIPLE SCLEROSISThe Lancet, 1986
- Chronic progressive multiple sclerosisNeurology, 1985
- Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosisNeurology, 1983
- Intensive Immunosuppression in Progressive Multiple SclerosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1983
- The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical DataPublished by JSTOR ,1977
- The Reliability of Clinical Methods, Data and JudgmentsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1975
- The Reliability of Clinical Methods, Data and JudgmentsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1975
- An assessment of the reliability of three methods used in evaluating the status of multiple sclerosis patientsJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1969