How to diagnose rheumatoid arthritis early: A prediction model for persistent (erosive) arthritis
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 5 February 2002
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wiley in Arthritis & Rheumatism
- Vol. 46 (2) , 357-365
- https://doi.org/10.1002/art.10117
Abstract
Objective To develop a clinical model for the prediction, at the first visit, of 3 forms of arthritis outcome: self‐limiting, persistent nonerosive, and persistent erosive arthritis. Methods A standardized diagnostic evaluation was performed on 524 consecutive, newly referred patients with early arthritis. Potentially diagnostic determinants obtained at the first visit from the patient's history, physical examination, and blood and imaging testing were entered in a logistic regression analysis. Arthritis outcome was recorded at 2 years' followup. The discriminative ability of the model was expressed as a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (AUC). Results The developed prediction model consisted of 7 variables: symptom duration at first visit, morning stiffness for ≥1 hour, arthritis in ≥3 joints, bilateral compression pain in the metatarsophalangeal joints, rheumatoid factor positivity, anti–cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody positivity, and the presence of erosions (hands/feet). Application of the model to an individual patient resulted in 3 clinically relevant predictive values: one for self‐limiting arthritis, one for persistent nonerosive arthritis, and one for persistent erosive arthritis. The ROC AUC of the model was 0.84 (SE 0.02) for discrimination between self‐limiting and persistent arthritis, and 0.91 (SE 0.02) for discrimination between persistent nonerosive and persistent erosive arthritis, whereas the discriminative ability of the American College of Rheumatology 1987 classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis was significantly lower, with ROC AUC values of 0.78 (SE 0.02) and 0.79 (SE 0.03), respectively. Conclusion A clinical prediction model was developed with an excellent ability to discriminate, at the first visit, between 3 forms of arthritis outcome. Validation in other early arthritis clinics is necessary.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Authors' reply: Diagnostic evaluation of classification criteria for RA and reactive arthritisAnnals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 2000
- Factors predicting response to treatment in rheumatoid arthritis: The importance of disease durationArthritis & Rheumatism, 2000
- OSTEOARTHRITIS IN WEIGHT-BEARING WRISTS?Rheumatology, 1993
- GENETIC FACTORS INFLUENCING THE OUTCOME OF EARLY ARTHRITIS-THE ROLE OF SULPHOXIDATION STATUSRheumatology, 1992
- The Utility of the 1987 Revised ARA Criteria for Rheumatoid Arthritis in Early SynovitisRheumatology, 1991
- QUANTITATIVE DETECTION OF CLASS-SPECIFIC RHEUMATOID FACTORS USING MOUSE MONOCLONAL ANTIBODIES AND THE BIOTIN/STREPTAVIDIN ENHANCEMENT SYSTEMRheumatology, 1989
- The american rheumatism association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritisArthritis & Rheumatism, 1988
- How many joints in the hands and wrists should be included in a score of radiologic abnormalities used to assess rheumatoid arthritis?Arthritis & Rheumatism, 1985
- The Threshold Approach to Clinical Decision MakingNew England Journal of Medicine, 1980
- Problems of Spectrum and Bias in Evaluating the Efficacy of Diagnostic TestsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1978