Errors and Correlates in Parental Recall of Child Immunizations: Effects on Vaccination Coverage Estimates
- 1 May 1997
- journal article
- Published by American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
- Vol. 99 (5) , e3
- https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.99.5.e3
Abstract
Objective. We evaluated the accuracy of parental recall of children’s immunization histories as compared with provider records and examined how errors in parental recall correlate with sociodemographic characteristics. Design. The validation study was part of a population-based household survey designed to assess immunization levels among Texas children under age 2 years. For 72% (n = 3278), interviewers used vaccination records from the parent to copy dates for the diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and pertussis vaccine (DTP), oral polio vaccine (OPV), and measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) shots. For parents without shot records (n = 1216), interviewers asked about each vaccine, whether the child had received the shot, how many, and at what age. Of these, 85% (n = 1029) were validated with health provider records. Results. Measured against provider records, only 34% of parents accurately recalled the number of DTP shots a child had. More often (42%) parents underestimated the number of DTP shots than overestimated (24%). Agreement between parental recall and provider records was high (83%) for the single dose of MMR. Accuracy of parents’ recall did not differ by race/ethnicity, education level, or type of health insurance coverage, but decreased as child’s age increased. Having a vaccination record at home was associated with a higher immunization status. Hispanic, lower educated, and uninsured parents were more likely to have a vaccination record than non-Hispanic, higher educated, and privately insured parents. Discussion. Validity of parental recall of children’s immunization histories depends on the vaccine and the age of the child, which is highly correlated with the number of shots parents must recollect. Results suggest that inclusion of parent recall information from vaccination surveys underestimates DTP:OPV:MMR coverage. This underestimation is consistent across economic and race/ethnic groups. Thus, community surveys based on cards and recall should provide reliable conclusions about which groups need intensive program efforts. For the routine monitoring of vaccination coverage, reasonable estimates can be obtained by combining parent-held record and parent recall data. Caution is required when comparing coverage estimates from different surveys since the source of information and method of derivation will produce widely varying coverage rates. vaccinations, immunization, validity, recall bias, infant.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of emergency department immunization on compliance with primary carePediatric Emergency Care, 1994
- Health cards, maternal reports and the measurement of immunization coverage: The example of GuatemalaSocial Science & Medicine, 1994
- Maternal recall error of child vaccination status in a developing nation.American Journal of Public Health, 1992
- The validity of parental report of vaccination as a measure of a child's measles immunisation statusThe Medical Journal of Australia, 1991
- Mothers' reports of childhood vaccinations and infections and their concordance with general practitioner recordsJournal of Public Health, 1991
- Immunisation state and its documentation in hospital patients.Archives of Disease in Childhood, 1990