The Surviving Sepsis Campaign: Results of an international guideline-based performance improvement program targeting severe sepsis*
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 1 February 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Critical Care Medicine
- Vol. 38 (2) , 367-374
- https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0b013e3181cb0cdc
Abstract
The Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC or "the Campaign") developed guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock. A performance improvement initiative targeted changing clinical behavior (process improvement) via bundles based on key SSC guideline recommendations. A multifaceted intervention to facilitate compliance with selected guideline recommendations in the intensive care unit, emergency department, and wards of individual hospitals and regional hospital networks was implemented voluntarily in the United States, Europe, and South America. Elements of the guidelines were "bundled" into two sets of targets to be completed within 6 hrs and within 24 hrs. An analysis was conducted on data submitted from January 2005 through March 2008. A total of 15,022 subjects. Data from 15,022 subjects at 165 sites were analyzed to determine the compliance with bundle targets and association with hospital mortality. Compliance with the entire resuscitation bundle increased linearly from 10.9% in the first site quarter to 31.3% by the end of 2 yrs (p < .0001). Compliance with the entire management bundle started at 18.4% in the first quarter and increased to 36.1% by the end of 2 yrs (p = .008). Compliance with all bundle elements increased significantly, except for inspiratory plateau pressure, which was high at baseline. Unadjusted hospital mortality decreased from 37% to 30.8% over 2 yrs (p = .001). The adjusted odds ratio for mortality improved the longer a site was in the Campaign, resulting in an adjusted absolute drop of 0.8% per quarter and 5.4% over 2 yrs (95% confidence interval, 2.5-8.4). The Campaign was associated with sustained, continuous quality improvement in sepsis care. Although not necessarily cause and effect, a reduction in reported hospital mortality rates was associated with participation. The implications of this study may serve as an impetus for similar improvement efforts.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Epidemiology of Sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000New England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- Effect of Treatment With Low Doses of Hydrocortisone and Fludrocortisone on Mortality in Patients With Septic ShockJAMA, 2002
- Intensive Insulin Therapy in Critically Ill PatientsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Early Goal-Directed Therapy in the Treatment of Severe Sepsis and Septic ShockNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: Analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of careCritical Care Medicine, 2001
- Efficacy and Safety of Recombinant Human Activated Protein C for Severe SepsisNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Low-dose dopamine in patients with early renal dysfunction: a placebo-controlled randomised trialThe Lancet, 2000
- Daily Interruption of Sedative Infusions in Critically Ill Patients Undergoing Mechanical VentilationNew England Journal of Medicine, 2000
- Ventilation with Lower Tidal Volumes as Compared with Traditional Tidal Volumes for Acute Lung Injury and the Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeNew England Journal of Medicine, 2000
- Effect on the Duration of Mechanical Ventilation of Identifying Patients Capable of Breathing SpontaneouslyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996