Energy expenditure by heart rate in children: an evaluation of calibration techniques

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
LIVINGSTONE, M. B. E., P. J. ROBSON, and M. TOTTON. Energy expenditure by heart rate in children: an evaluation of calibration techniques. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., Vol. 32, No. 8, pp. 1513–1519, 2000. To evaluate the impact of applying seven calibration equations (CE) in the estimation of free-living total energy expenditure (TEE) over 2–3 d in seven boys (mean ± SD age 9.4 ± 0.4 yr) by the Flex heart rate (HR) method. HR and oxygen consumption were measured simultaneously for eight activities (lying, sitting, standing, arm-reaching exercise, a stooping-and-twisting exercise, stepping, treadmill walking/running, and cycle ergometry) carried out in sequence. CE were derived from various combinations of activities. Flex HRs were identified for each CE. There were no significant differences in TEE estimates [range (mean ± SD); 6.65 ± 0.72 to 7.27 ± 0.89 MJ·d−1] derived from any of the CE. Mean daytime HR ranged from 86 ± 4 to 122 ± 15 beats·min−1, and 82−98% of recorded daytime HR was ≤ 140 beats·min−1. As a result, within-subject CV in TEE from each of the CE ranged from 2.2% to 8.9%. Mean between-subject Flex HR ranged from 94 ± 8 to 111 ± 8 beats·min−1. No significant differences were observed in corresponding TEE estimates. However, mean activity energy expenditure (AEE) ranged from 2.10 ± 1.18 MJ·d−1 (based on Flex HR 111 ± 8 beats·min−1) to 3.55 ± 1.44 MJ·d−1 (based on Flex HR 94 ± 8 beats·min−1; NS). The corresponding estimates of resting energy expenditure (REE) were 1.89 ± 0.82 MJ·d−1 (Flex HR 111 ± 8 beats·min−1) and 1.05 ± 0.60 MJ·d−1 (Flex HR 94 ± 8 beats·min−1). Only the differences between the minimum and maximum estimates of REE were significant ( P Unduly lengthy and complex calibration procedures for the estimation of Flex HR TEE may not be justified in most cases, particularly in sedentary children.

This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit: