The Burden of Treatment Failure in Type 2 Diabetes
Open Access
- 1 July 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Diabetes Association in Diabetes Care
- Vol. 27 (7) , 1535-1540
- https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.27.7.1535
Abstract
OBJECTIVE—In type 2 diabetes, therapies to maintain blood glucose control usually fail after several years. We estimated the glycemic burden that accumulates from treatment failure and describe the time course and predictors of failure. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—A prospective, population-based study using retrospective observational data. We identified all 7,208 complete courses of treatment with nondrug therapy, sulfonylurea monotherapy, metformin monotherapy, and combination oral antihyperglycemic therapy between 1994 and 2002, inclusive, among members of the Kaiser Permanente Northwest Region. We calculated mean cumulative glycemic burden, defined as HbA1c-months >8.0 or 7.0% for each treatment. We then measured the likelihood that the next HbA1c would exceed 8.0 and 7.0% after HbA1c exceeded each of ten hypothetical treatment thresholds. Finally, we estimated multivariate logistic regression models to predict when HbA1c would continue to deteriorate. RESULTS—In this well-controlled population, the average patient accumulated nearly 5 HbA1c-years of excess glycemic burden >8.0% from diagnosis until starting insulin and about 10 HbA1c-years of burden >7.0%. Whenever patients crossed the American Diabetes Association-recommended treatment threshold of 8.0%, their next HbA1c result was as likely to be 8.0%. Multivariate prediction models had highly statistically significant coefficients, but predicted 1c results. CONCLUSIONS—Clinicians should change glucose-lowering treatments in type 2 diabetes much sooner or use treatments that are less likely to fail. An action point at 7.0% or lower is more likely to prevent additional deterioration than the traditional action point of 8.0%.This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Standards of Medical Care in DiabetesDiabetes Care, 2004
- Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes MellitusDiabetes Care, 2003
- Standards of Medical Care for Patients With Diabetes MellitusDiabetes Care, 2003
- Standards of Medical Care for Patients With Diabetes MellitusDiabetes Care, 2002
- The Mt. Hood challenge: cross-testing two diabetes simulation modelsDiabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 2000
- Achieving further glycemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitusWestern Journal of Medicine, 2000
- Case-control study of 10 years of comprehensive diabetes careWestern Journal of Medicine, 2000
- Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33)The Lancet, 1998
- Intensive insulin therapy prevents the progression of diabetic microvascular complications in Japanese patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: a randomized prospective 6-year studyDiabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 1995
- The Effect of Intensive Treatment of Diabetes on the Development and Progression of Long-Term Complications in Insulin-Dependent Diabetes MellitusNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993