Perceived Risk, Real Risk: Social Science and the Art of Probabilistic Risk Assessment
- 7 October 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in Science
- Vol. 242 (4875) , 44-49
- https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3175635
Abstract
Risk assessment is commonly seen as the domain of physical and biological sciences, with social scientists focusing instead on risk management and communication. This division is unnecessary, and it may lead to errors in risk assessments. Social science input is needed for more accurate calculations of risk consequences and probabilities and for identifying potential biases created by certain risk assessment procedures, as well as in analyzing and explaining public responses to risk. Findings, moreover, suggest that the dichotomy between "real" and "perceived" risk is less "real" than is often assumed, particularly in cases involving controversial technologies.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Social Amplification of Risk: A Conceptual FrameworkRisk Analysis, 1988
- Nevada Wins the Nuclear Waste LotteryScience, 1988
- Assessing uncertainty in physical constantsAmerican Journal of Physics, 1986
- Feynman Issues His Own Shuttle Report, Attacking NASA's Risk EstimatesScience, 1986
- Decision Making Under AmbiguityThe Journal of Business, 1986
- Multidimensional Criteria for Technology Acceptability: A Response to Bernard L. CohenRisk Analysis, 1985
- Nuclear Reactions: Public Attitudes and Policies Toward Nuclear PowerReview of Policy Research, 1985
- HARD‐PATH VERSUS SOFT‐PATH ADVOCATES: A STUDY OF ENERGY ACTIVISTSPolicy Studies Journal, 1984
- Do those who know more also know more about how much they know?Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1977
- Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and BiasesScience, 1974