Antenatal detection of growth retardation: actual practice in a large maternity hospital
- 1 January 1982
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
- Vol. 89 (1) , 12-15
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1982.tb04626.x
Abstract
Summary. A retrospective analysis of the antenatal management of 226 cases of growth retardation was carried out. One‐hundred‐and‐fourteen cases (50%) were not suspected antenatally. Of the 112 suspected cases, 107 were subjected to further tests of fetal well‐being. Eighty‐one (72%) of the 112 received no further action or surveillance because of erroneously reassuring results or no further tests. Thirty‐one women were either admitted antenatally (15) or delivered early (16). The low rate of initial suspicion combined with the disappointing results of the further tests emphasizes the need for more accurate screening procedures for growth‐retarded babies.This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- PREDICTION OF SMALL‐FOR‐DATES INFANTS BY MEASUREMENT OF SYMPHYSIAL‐FUNDAL‐HEIGHTBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1981
- IS ROUTINE ANTENATAL CARE WORTH WHILE?The Lancet, 1980
- Screening for the small-for-dates fetus: a two-stage ultrasonic examination schedule.BMJ, 1980
- Diagnosis of intrauterine growth retardation by a simple clinical method: Measurement of uterine heightAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1978
- Predicting fetal death by measuring oestrogen:creatinine ratios on early morning samples of urine.BMJ, 1977
- THE ASSESSMENT OF FETAL GROWTHBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1968