Creeping Universalism in the Welfare State: Evidence from Australia
- 1 July 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Journal of Public Policy
- Vol. 6 (3) , 255-274
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0143814x00004025
Abstract
There are good reasons to suppose that the non-poor will infiltrate welfare programmes originally targeted on the poor. This paper discusses this phenomenon of ‘creeping universalisation’ and provides a number of possible explanations for it. Evidence is used from Australia to show that creeping universalisation does indeed occur, and to test the competing explanations. It is concluded that the most likely explanation for the phenomenon is individual behavioural responses: that is, the non-poor respond to the imposition of a means-test by re-arranging their affairs, legitimately or illegitimately, so as to pass the test.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Bureaucrats, Budgets and the Growth of the State: Reconstructing an Instrumental ModelBritish Journal of Political Science, 1985
- Policy Weaknesses and Political OpportunitiesSocial Service Review, 1985
- A Theory of Competition Among Pressure Groups for Political InfluenceThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1983
- Legal UncertaintyCalifornia Law Review, 1983
- RATIONAL POLITICIANS AND RATIONAL BUREAUCRATS IN WASHINGTON AND WHITEHALLPublic Administration, 1982
- The Transformation of Social ServicesSocial Service Review, 1977
- Testing for Serial Correlation in Least-Squares Regression When Some of the Regressors are Lagged Dependent VariablesEconometrica, 1970
- Director's Law of Public Income RedistributionThe Journal of Law and Economics, 1970
- The Economic Theory of ‘Managerial’ CapitalismPublished by Springer Nature ,1964
- Why The Government Budget Is Too Small in a DemocracyWorld Politics, 1960