Analysis of the SAGES outcomes initiative cholecystectomy registry
- 7 December 2005
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Surgical Endoscopy
- Vol. 20 (1) , 43-50
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0378-0
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- NIS vs SAGESSurgical Endoscopy, 2006
- A nationwide study of conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomyThe American Journal of Surgery, 2004
- Spilled gall stones during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a review of the literaturePublished by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,2004
- Bile Duct Injury During Cholecystectomy and Survival in Medicare BeneficiariesJAMA, 2003
- A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Intraoperative Cholangiography in the Prevention of Bile Duct Injury During Laparoscopic CholecystectomyJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 2003
- A report on the Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) outcomes initiative:Surgical Endoscopy, 2002
- Common Bile Duct Injury During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and the Use of Intraoperative CholangiographyArchives of Surgery, 2001
- Outcomes analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the extremely elderlySurgical Endoscopy, 2001
- STS database activities and you: “what’s in it for me?”The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2001
- Bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomySurgical Endoscopy, 1998