Informed Patient Choice: Patient-Centered Valuing Of Surgical Risks And Benefits
- 1 May 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Health Affairs (Project Hope) in Health Affairs
- Vol. 26 (3) , 726-730
- https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.26.3.726
Abstract
The risks and benefits of any health care intervention are valued differently by stakeholders. One of the ethical imperatives of patient-centered care is the balanced, evidence-based presentation of risks and benefits by providers to patients. Using the example of musculoskeletal surgery with devices, we advocate the use of shared decision-making tools and processes known to improve knowledge, adjust unrealistic expectations, and elicit values about benefits desired and the degree of acceptable risks for individual patients. We describe feasibility and efficacy within our organization and address ways to foster the further adoption of this approach.This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisionsPublished by Wiley ,2011
- Rethinking Informed Consent: The Case for Shared Medical Decision-MakingAmerican Journal of Law & Medicine, 2006
- Surgical vs Nonoperative Treatment for Lumbar Disk HerniationJAMA, 2006
- Surgical vs Nonoperative Treatment for Lumbar Disk HerniationJAMA, 2006
- Patient-Centered Informed Consent in Surgical PracticeArchives of Surgery, 2006
- Partnership: Doctor and PatientSpine, 2005
- Policy Support For Patient-Centered Care: The Need For Measurable Improvements In Decision QualityHealth Affairs, 2004
- Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisionsPublished by Wiley ,2003
- Design of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT)Spine, 2002
- Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: What does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango)Social Science & Medicine, 1997