Neuropathological background of phenotypical variability in frontotemporal dementia
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 26 May 2011
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in Acta Neuropathologica
- Vol. 122 (2) , 137-153
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-011-0839-6
Abstract
Frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) is the umbrella term encompassing a heterogeneous group of pathological disorders. With recent discoveries, the FTLDs have been show to classify nicely into three main groups based on the major protein deposited in the brain: FTLD-tau, FTLD-TDP and FTLD-FUS. These pathological groups, and their specific pathologies, underlie a number of well-defined clinical syndromes, including three frontotemporal dementia (FTD) variants [behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), progressive non-fluent aphasia, and semantic dementia (SD)], progressive supranuclear palsy syndrome (PSPS) and corticobasal syndrome (CBS). Understanding the neuropathological background of the phenotypic variability in FTD, PSPS and CBS requires large clinicopathological studies. We review current knowledge on the relationship between the FTLD pathologies and clinical syndromes, and pool data from a number of large clinicopathological studies that collectively provide data on 544 cases. Strong relationships were identified as follows: FTD with motor neuron disease and FTLD-TDP; SD and FTLD-TDP; PSPS and FTLD-tau; and CBS and FTLD-tau. However, the relationship between some of these clinical diagnoses and specific pathologies is not so clear cut. In addition, the clinical diagnosis of bvFTD does not have a strong relationship to any FTLD subtype or specific pathology and therefore remains a diagnostic challenge. Some evidence suggests improved clinicopathological association of bvFTD by further refining clinical characteristics. Unlike FTLD-tau and FTLD-TDP, FTLD-FUS has been less well characterized, with only 69 cases reported. However, there appears to be some associations between clinical phenotypes and FTLD-FUS pathologies. Clinical diagnosis is therefore promising in predicting molecular pathology.Keywords
This publication has 134 references indexed in Scilit:
- FUS pathology defines the majority of tau- and TDP-43-negative frontotemporal lobar degenerationActa Neuropathologica, 2010
- Nomenclature and nosology for neuropathologic subtypes of frontotemporal lobar degeneration: an updateActa Neuropathologica, 2009
- Survival Profiles of Patients With Frontotemporal Dementia and Motor Neuron DiseaseArchives of Neurology, 2009
- Abundant FUS-immunoreactive pathology in neuronal intermediate filament inclusion diseaseActa Neuropathologica, 2009
- Evaluation of subcortical pathology and clinical correlations in FTLD-U subtypesActa Neuropathologica, 2009
- Nomenclature for neuropathologic subtypes of frontotemporal lobar degeneration: consensus recommendationsActa Neuropathologica, 2008
- Alzheimer and frontotemporal pathology in subsets of primary progressive aphasiaAnnals of Neurology, 2008
- Neuropathologic diagnostic and nosologic criteria for frontotemporal lobar degeneration: consensus of the Consortium for Frontotemporal Lobar DegenerationActa Neuropathologica, 2007
- Heterogeneity of ubiquitin pathology in frontotemporal lobar degeneration: classification and relation to clinical phenotypeActa Neuropathologica, 2006
- Frontotemporal dementia: Clinicopathological correlationsAnnals of Neurology, 2006