Tritanopic purity-difference function to describe the properties of minimally distinct borders*
- 1 October 1977
- journal article
- Published by Optica Publishing Group in Journal of the Optical Society of America
- Vol. 67 (10) , 1330-1336
- https://doi.org/10.1364/josa.67.001330
Abstract
Tansley and Boynton have recently demonstrated that color stimuli whose chromaticities all fall on a particular triptanopic confusion line in the CIE (x, y) diagram do not form distinct borders with each other. A tritanopic purity-difference function, involving only r- and g-cone contributions, is demonstrated to provide (i) a prediction of which chromatic stimuli have equivalent border-forming properties, and (ii) a description of the distinctness of minimally distinct borders (MDB) in terms of an equivalent luminance contrast. The tritanopic purity-difference concept is demonstrated to account for all available data on the assessment of the distinctness of borders at the MDB point.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Line, Not a Space, Represents Visual Distinctness of Borders Formed by Different ColorsScience, 1976
- A closer look at the tritanopic convergence pointVision Research, 1974
- Color induction: Dependence on luminance, purity, and dominant or complementary wavelength of inducing stimuliJournal of the Optical Society of America, 1974
- Scaling of large chromatic differencesVision Research, 1974
- Chromatic border distinctness and its relation to saturationVision Research, 1971
- Minimally Distinct Border as a Preferred Psychophysical Criterion in Visual Heterochromatic PhotometryJournal of the Optical Society of America, 1971
- Vision: The Additivity Law Made To Work for Heterochromatic Photometry with Bipartite FieldsScience, 1968