Defining death in non-heart beating organ donors
Open Access
- 1 June 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Journal of Medical Ethics
- Vol. 29 (3) , 182-185
- https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.29.3.182
Abstract
Protocols for retrieving vital organs in consenting patients in cardiovascular arrest (non-heart beating donors, NHBD) rest on the assumptions that irreversible asystole a) identifies the instant of biological death, and b) is clinically assessable at the time when retrieval of vital organs is possible. Unfortunately both assumptions are flawed. We argue that traditional life/death definitions could be actually inadequate to represent the reality of dying under intensive support, and we suggest redefining NHBD protocols on moral, social, and antrhopological criteria, admitting that irreversible (however defined) asystole can only equate a clinically determinable point of no return in the process of dying, where organ retrieval can be morally and socially accepted in previously consenting patients.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Brain and Somatic Integration: Insights Into the Standard Biological Rationale for Equating Brain Death With DeathJournal of Medicine and Philosophy, 2001
- When Is "Dead"?Hastings Center Report, 1999
- Unexpected return of spontaneous circulation after cessation of resuscitation (Lazarus phenomenon)Resuscitation, 1998
- Is It Time to Abandon Brain Death?Hastings Center Report, 1997
- Prolonged Asystolic Hyperkalemic Cardiac Arrest With No Neurologic Sequelae: The Lazarus Phenomenon Arises AgainAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1995
- Prolonged Asystolic Hyperkalemic Cardiac Arrest With No Neurologic SequelaeAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1994
- The Lazarus Phenomenon RevisitedAnesthesiology, 1993
- Restoration of spontaneous circulation after cessation of cardiopulmonary resuscitationThe Lancet, 1993
- Rethinking brain deathCritical Care Medicine, 1992
- Whole-brain death reconsidered.Journal of Medical Ethics, 1983