Dimensions of Partisan Conflict in Swiss Cantons
- 1 January 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Comparative Political Studies
- Vol. 16 (4) , 505-527
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414084016004004
Abstract
One of the intriguing problems of empirical democratic theory is to explain the stability of Switzerland, a society divided both by language and by religion. Kerr (1974) suggests federalism as an explanation, because it both defuses political conflict and allows different patterns of party conflict to emerge in French and Geman speaking areas. Analysis of split votes (panachage) from the 1975 election of the National Council shows wide variation in party spaces at the cantonal level, but such variation exists within religio-linguistic groups of cantons as well as across groups. Comparison to similar data from 1951 shows the level of panachage to be increasing along with divergence among cantonal party systems. This is consistent with Lijphart's (1969) hypothesis that Switzerland is entering a postconsociational period.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Research Strategies beyond Consociational TheoryThe Journal of Politics, 1981
- Democracy in Plural SocietiesPublished by Yale University Press ,1980
- Consociational Democracy and the Case of SwitzerlandThe Journal of Politics, 1980
- Party Cohesion in the Swiss ParliamentLegislative Studies Quarterly, 1978
- The Structure of Opposition in the Swiss ParliamentLegislative Studies Quarterly, 1978
- The Swiss and their politicsGovernment and Opposition, 1976
- Review Article: Political Accommodation and Consociational DemocracyBritish Journal of Political Science, 1975
- Social Cohesion, Political Parties and Strains in RegimesComparative Political Studies, 1969
- Consociational DemocracyWorld Politics, 1969