Assessing Growth Patterns—Routine but Sometimes Overlooked
- 1 February 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Clinical Pediatrics
- Vol. 39 (2) , 97-102
- https://doi.org/10.1177/000992280003900204
Abstract
We performed a retrospective chart review for 149, randomly selected well-child encounters to evaluate the frequency with which clinicians; plot growth measurements and document growth abnormalities during health maintenance visits. Providers failed to plot at least one measurement of height, weight, and/or head circumference in 31 of 149 encounters (21%, 95% CI=14.5% to 27.5%). Growth abnormalities in size, velocity, and/or disproportion were not documented in 22 of 40 relevant encounters (55%, 95% CI=40% to 70%). Overall, 52 of 149 encounters (35%) were associated with an unplotted measurement and/or an undocumented growth abnormality. We feel that both documentation and assessment of growth represent potential areas for quality improvement.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Transition to a computer-based record using scannable, structured encounter forms.Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 1997
- Managing temporal worlds for medical trend diagnosisArtificial Intelligence in Medicine, 1996
- Growth and Its AssessmentAdvances in Pediatrics, 1995
- ASSESSING NORMAL AND ABNORMAL PATTERNS OF GROWTHPrimary Care: Clinics in Office Practice, 1994
- Infant growth charts.Archives of Disease in Childhood, 1994