Systematic Review: Gene Expression Profiling Assays in Early-Stage Breast Cancer
- 4 March 2008
- journal article
- review article
- Published by American College of Physicians in Annals of Internal Medicine
- Vol. 148 (5) , 358-369
- https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-148-5-200803040-00208
Abstract
Three gene expression–based prognostic breast cancer tests have been licensed for use. To summarize evidence on the validity and utility of 3 gene expression–based prognostic breast cancer tests: Oncotype DX (Genomic Health, Redwood City, California), MammaPrint (Agendia BV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands), and H/I (AvariaDX, Carlsbad, California). MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases (from 1990 through January 2007), Web sites of test manufacturers, and discussion with the manufacturers. Original data studies published in English that addressed prognostic accuracy and discrimination or treatment benefit prediction of any of the 3 tests in women with breast cancer. Information was extracted about the clinical characteristics of the study population (particularly clinical and therapeutic homogeneity), tumor characteristics, and whether the marketed test or underlying signature was evaluated. The tests are based on distinct gene lists, using 2 different technologies. Overall, the body of evidence showed that this new generation of tests may improve prognostic and therapeutic prediction, but the tests are at different stages of development. Evidence shows that the tests offer clinically relevant, improved risk stratification over standard predictors. Oncotype DX has the strongest evidence, closely followed by MammaPrint and H/I (which is still maturing). For all tests, the relationship of predicted to observed risk in different populations and their incremental contribution over conventional predictors, optimal implementation, and relevance to patients receiving current therapies need further study. Gene expression technologies show great promise to improve predictions of prognosis and treatment benefit for women with early-stage breast cancer. More information is needed on the extent of improvement in prediction, characteristics of women in whom the tests should be used, and how best to incorporate test results into decision making about breast cancer treatment.Keywords
This publication has 52 references indexed in Scilit:
- Faculty Opinions recommendation of A gene-expression signature as a predictor of survival in breast cancer.Published by H1 Connect ,2015
- Exploring the two-gene ratio in breast cancer—independent roles for HOXB13 and IL17BR in prediction of clinical outcomeBreast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2007
- Faculty Opinions recommendation of Concordance among gene-expression-based predictors for breast cancer.Published by H1 Connect ,2006
- Predicting response to primary chemotherapy: gene expression profiling of paraffin-embedded core biopsy tissueBreast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2006
- A two-gene expression ratio predicts clinical outcome in breast cancer patients treated with tamoxifenPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- Measurement of Gene Expression in Archival Paraffin-Embedded TissuesThe American Journal of Pathology, 2004
- Towards a novel classification of human malignancies based on gene expression patternsThe Journal of Pathology, 2001
- Clinical Prediction RulesA Review and Suggested Modifications of Methodological StandardsJAMA, 1997
- MULTIVARIABLE PROGNOSTIC MODELS: ISSUES IN DEVELOPING MODELS, EVALUATING ASSUMPTIONS AND ADEQUACY, AND MEASURING AND REDUCING ERRORSStatistics in Medicine, 1996
- TP53 mutations and abnormal p53 protein staining in breast carcinomas related to prognosisEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 1995