A Comparison of Model- and Satellite-Derived Aerosol Optical Depth and Reflectivity
- 1 February 2002
- journal article
- Published by American Meteorological Society in Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
- Vol. 59 (3) , 441-460
- https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059<0441:acomas>2.0.co;2
Abstract
The determination of an accurate quantitative understanding of the role of tropospheric aerosols in the earth's radiation budget is extremely important because forcing by anthropogenic aerosols presently represents one of the most uncertain aspects of climate models. Here the authors present a systematic comparison of three different analyses of satellite-retrieved aerosol optical depth based on the Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR)-measured radiances with optical depths derived from six different models. Also compared are the model-derived clear-sky reflected shortwave radiation with satellite-measured reflectivities derived from the Earth Radiation Budget Experiment (ERBE) satellite. The three different satellite-derived optical depths differ by between −0.10 and 0.07 optical depth units in comparison to the average of the three analyses depending on latitude and month, but the general features of the retrievals are similar. The models differ by between −0.09 and +0.16 optical de... Abstract The determination of an accurate quantitative understanding of the role of tropospheric aerosols in the earth's radiation budget is extremely important because forcing by anthropogenic aerosols presently represents one of the most uncertain aspects of climate models. Here the authors present a systematic comparison of three different analyses of satellite-retrieved aerosol optical depth based on the Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR)-measured radiances with optical depths derived from six different models. Also compared are the model-derived clear-sky reflected shortwave radiation with satellite-measured reflectivities derived from the Earth Radiation Budget Experiment (ERBE) satellite. The three different satellite-derived optical depths differ by between −0.10 and 0.07 optical depth units in comparison to the average of the three analyses depending on latitude and month, but the general features of the retrievals are similar. The models differ by between −0.09 and +0.16 optical de...Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sources and distributions of dust aerosols simulated with the GOCART modelJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2001
- Atmospheric sulfur cycle simulated in the global model GOCART: Model description and global propertiesJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2000
- Characterization of aerosols over ocean from POLDER/ADEOS‐1Geophysical Research Letters, 1999
- A time‐averaged inventory of subaerial volcanic sulfur emissionsJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 1998
- Aerosol light scattering properties at Cape Grim, Tasmania, during the First Aerosol Characterization Experiment (ACE 1)Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 1998
- An assessment of the radiative effects of anthropogenic sulfateJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 1997
- Global gridded inventories of anthropogenic emissions of sulfur and nitrogenJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 1996
- Simulation of the tropospheric sulfur cycle in a global climate modelAtmospheric Environment, 1996
- A Multiyear Global Surface Wind Velocity Dataset Using SSM/I Wind ObservationsBulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 1996
- A three-dimensional model of the global ammonia cycleJournal of Atmospheric Chemistry, 1994