Individual participant data meta-analyses should not ignore clustering
Open Access
- 1 August 2013
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 66 (8) , 865-873.e4
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.12.017
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 48 references indexed in Scilit:
- Individual participant data meta-analysis of prognostic factor studies: state of the art?BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2012
- Covariate adjustment increased power in randomized controlled trials: an example in traumatic brain injuryJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2011
- Systematically missing confounders in individual participant data meta‐analysis of observational cohort studiesStatistics in Medicine, 2009
- A re‐evaluation of the ‘quantile approximation method’ for random effects meta‐analysisStatistics in Medicine, 2008
- Meta‐analysis of diagnostic test studies using individual patient data and aggregate dataStatistics in Medicine, 2008
- Meta‐analysis of continuous outcomes combining individual patient data and aggregate dataStatistics in Medicine, 2007
- To IPD or not to IPD?Evaluation & the Health Professions, 2002
- Clinical trials in acute myocardial infarction: Should we adjust for baseline characteristics?American Heart Journal, 2000
- Meta-analysis in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1986
- Beta blockade during and after myocardial infarction: An overview of the randomized trialsProgress in Cardiovascular Diseases, 1985