A comparison of robot-assisted versus manually constructed endoscopic coronary anastomosis
- 1 September 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
- Vol. 70 (3) , 839-842
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-4975(00)01738-0
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting with the aid of robotic assisted instrumentsThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1999
- Use of the voice-controlled and computer-assisted surgical system zeus for endoscopic coronary artery bypass graftingThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1999
- Computer-enhanced coronary artery bypass surgeryThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1999
- Safety and cost-effectiveness of MIDCABG in high-risk CABG patientsThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1998
- Robotic Surgical Instruments for Dexterity Enhancement in Thoracoscopic Coronary Artery Bypass GraftJournal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques, 1997
- Minimally invasive thoracoscopically assisted coronary artery bypass surgeryEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 1997
- Port-access coronary artery bypass grafting: A proposed surgical methodThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1996
- A quantification of dexterityRobotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 1989