Chlorophyll c–Containing Plastid Relationships Based on Analyses of a Multigene Data Set with All Four Chromalveolate Lineages
Open Access
- 25 May 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Molecular Biology and Evolution
- Vol. 22 (9) , 1772-1782
- https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msi172
Abstract
The chlorophyll c–containing algae comprise four major lineages: dinoflagellates, haptophytes, heterokonts, and cryptophytes. These four lineages have sometimes been grouped together based on their pigmentation, but cytological and rRNA data had suggested that they were not a monophyletic lineage. Some molecular data support monophyly of the plastids, while other plastid and host data suggest different relationships. It is uncontroversial that these groups have all acquired plastids from another eukaryote, probably from the red algal lineage, in a secondary endosymbiotic event, but the number and sequence of such event(s) remain controversial. Understanding chlorophyll c–containing plastid relationships is a first step towards determining the number of endosymbiotic events within the chromalveolates. We report here phylogenetic analyses using 10 plastid genes with representatives of all four chromalveolate lineages. This is the first organellar genome-scale analysis to include both haptophytes and dinoflagellates. Concatenated analyses support the monophyly of the chlorophyll c–containing plastids and suggest that cryptophyte plastids are the basal member of the chlorophyll c–containing plastid lineage. The gene psbA, which has at times been used for phylogenetic purposes, was found to differ from the other genes in its placement of the dinoflagellates and the haptophytes, and in its lack of support for monophyly of the green and red plastid lineages. Overall, the concatenated data are consistent with a single origin of chlorophyll c–containing plastids from red algae. However, these data cannot test several key hypothesis concerning chromalveolate host monophyly, and do not preclude the possibility of serial transfer of chlorophyll c–containing plastids among distantly related hosts.Keywords
This publication has 46 references indexed in Scilit:
- Gene Replacement of Fructose-1,6-Bisphosphate Aldolase Supports the Hypothesis of a Single Photosynthetic Ancestor of ChromalveolatesEukaryotic Cell, 2004
- Plastid-Derived Single Gene Minicircles of the Dinoflagellate Ceratium horridum Are Localized in the NucleusMolecular Biology and Evolution, 2004
- Dinoflagellate Expressed Sequence Tag Data Indicate Massive Transfer of Chloroplast Genes to the Nuclear GenomeProtist, 2004
- Comparison of phylogenies based on nuclear-encoded SSU rDNA and plastid-encoded psbA in the symbiotic dinoflagellate genus SymbiodiniumPhycologia, 2003
- THE SYMBIOTIC BIRTH AND SPREAD OF PLASTIDS: HOW MANY TIMES AND WHODUNIT?Journal of Phycology, 2003
- A Cyanobacterial Gene in Nonphotosynthetic Protists—An Early Chloroplast Acquisition in Eukaryotes?Current Biology, 2002
- ‘Empty’ minicircles and petB/atpA and psbD/psbE (cytb559 α) genes in tandem in Amphidinium carterae plastid DNA1FEBS Letters, 2001
- Dinophyte chloroplasts and phylogeny - A reviewGrana, 1999
- A Nuclear-Encoded Form II RuBisCO in DinoflagellatesScience, 1995
- The rapid generation of mutation data matrices from protein sequencesBioinformatics, 1992