A Comparison of Lord's χ2 and Raju's Area Measures In Detection of DIF
- 1 March 1993
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Applied Psychological Measurement
- Vol. 17 (1) , 39-52
- https://doi.org/10.1177/014662169301700109
Abstract
The area between item response functions esti mated in different samples is often used as a measure of differential item functioning (DIF). Under item response theory, this area should be 0, except for errors of measurement. This study examined the effectiveness of two statistical tests of this area—a Z test for exact signed area and a Z test for exact unsigned area—for different test length, sample size, proportion of DIF items on the test, and item parameter estimation conditions using the two- parameter model. Errors in detection made using these two statistics were compared with errors made using Lord's χ2. Differences between all three statistics were relatively small; however, the χ2 statistic was more effective than either of the two Z tests at detecting simulated DIF. The Z test for the exact signed area was the least effective and was the most likely to result in false negative errors.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effects of Linking Methods on Detection of DIFJournal of Educational Measurement, 1992
- A Comparison of Two Area Measures for Detecting Differential Item FunctioningApplied Psychological Measurement, 1991
- EQUATE: A Computer Program for the Test Characteristic Curve Method of IRT EquatingApplied Psychological Measurement, 1991
- Influence of Prior Distributions on Detection of DIFJournal of Educational Measurement, 1991
- An Evaluation of Marginal Maximum Likelihood Estimation for the Two-Parameter Logistic ModelApplied Psychological Measurement, 1989
- An Iterative Procedure for Linking Metrics and Assessing Item Bias in Item Response TheoryApplied Psychological Measurement, 1988
- Cross-Language and Cross-Cultural Comparisons in Scale TranslationsJournal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1986
- A Minimum Chi-Square Method for Developing a Common Metric in Item Response TheoryApplied Psychological Measurement, 1985
- Item Bias in a Test of Reading ComprehensionApplied Psychological Measurement, 1981
- A COMPARISON OF SEVERAL METHODS OF ASSESSING ITEM BIASJournal of Educational Measurement, 1979