Specificity of Procedure Volume and In-hospital Mortality Association
- 1 July 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Annals of Surgery
- Vol. 246 (1) , 135-139
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000259823.54786.83
Abstract
Several studies have examined the association between procedure-specific volume and in-hospital mortality and concluded that high-volume hospitals have lower mortality rates when compared with low-volume hospitals. There is a paucity of studies examining the association between unrelated procedure volume and in-hospital mortality. The objective of our study is to examine the procedure-specific volume–outcome association as well as unrelated procedure volume–outcome association for 5 procedures: coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (AAA), pancreatectomy (PAN), and esophagectomy (ESO). Nationwide Inpatient Sample for years 2000 through 2003 was used. All discharges with primary procedure codes for CABG, PCI, AAA, PAN, and ESO were selected. The average number of procedures performed by the hospitals per year during the study period was computed, and hospitals were categorized as having met or not met the Leapfrog Group-recommended volume thresholds. Procedure specific and unrelated procedure volume–in-hospital mortality association was examined by using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Procedure volume–in-hospital mortality association was adjusted for patient and hospital characteristics. For all 5 procedures, hospitals that did not meet Leapfrog Group volume thresholds were associated with significantly higher odds for in-hospital mortality when compared with hospitals that met Leapfrog Group volume thresholds (P Conclusions: Hospital volume–in-hospital mortality association appears largely to be specific to the procedure being studied.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mortality After Major Surgery for Urologic Cancers in Specialized Urology Hospitals: Are They Any Better?Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2006
- Hospital Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Volume and Patient Mortality, 1998–2000Annals of Surgery, 2004
- Surgeon Volume and Operative Mortality in the United StatesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- Statistical Analysis of Correlated Data Using Generalized Estimating Equations: An OrientationAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2003
- Hospital Volume and Surgical Mortality in the United StatesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- The influence of hospital and surgeon volume on in-hospital mortality for colectomy, gastrectomy, and lung lobectomy in patients with cancerSurgery, 2002
- Association between percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty volumes and outcomes in the healthcare cost and utilization project 1993-1994The American Journal of Cardiology, 1999
- Importance of Hospital Volume in the Overall Management of Pancreatic CancerAnnals of Surgery, 1998
- A longitudinal analysis of the relationship between in-hospital mortality in New York State and the volume of abdominal aortic aneurysm surgeries performed.1992
- A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validationJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1987