Abstract
The relationship between work and leisure patterns is examined utilizing data on the occupational prestige and outdoor recreation participation levels for a national sample of Canadian households. Occupation is found to be a relatively weak predictor of outdoor recreation activity. In view of this finding, it is suggested that in testing the work-leisure relationship detailed assessments of the nature of a person's work should be employed rather than the more general occupational rankings. It is further suggested that a thorough classification of leisure behaviours should be employed as the dependent variable. This would ensure a more precise delimitation of the effects of multiple conditions of work on the various forms of leisure.

This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit: