The use of Statistics in the British Journal of Psychiatry
- 1 November 1995
- journal article
- Published by Royal College of Psychiatrists in The British Journal of Psychiatry
- Vol. 167 (5) , 683-688
- https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.167.5.683
Abstract
BACKGROUND Statistical error rates in the medical literature are generally high. METHOD All papers published in the British Journal of Psychiatry in 1993 which presented numerical results were reviewed by the author for statistical errors. RESULTS A total of 248 papers were published, of which 164 (66%) presented numerical results. Sixty-five (40% of 164) papers contained statistical errors. Many errors were not serious in nature, but some were serious enough to cast doubt on conclusions. The error rates are similar to those found in an earlier study. CONCLUSIONS The statistical error rate is unacceptably high. There is no evidence of a change in the statistical error rate over time.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Statistic Notes: Regression towards the meanBMJ, 1994
- The scandal of poor medical researchBMJ, 1994
- Clinical Methodologies and Incidence of Appropriate Statistical Testing in Orthopaedic Spine LiteratureSpine, 1993
- STATISTICAL AWARENESS OF RESEARCH WORKERS IN BRITISH ANAESTHESIABritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1992
- Statistical Problems in the Reporting of Clinical TrialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- Analysis of clinical fertility trials: a methodologic reviewFertility and Sterility, 1986
- The role of statistics in psychiatryPsychological Medicine, 1985
- Statistics in medical journals: A survey of current policies and proposals for editorsMedical and Pediatric Oncology, 1985
- Biostatistics: how to detect, correct and prevent errors in the medical literature.Circulation, 1980
- Statistical Errors in Papers in the British Journal of PsychiatryThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 1979