"Conclusions about exposure to ETS and health that will be unhelpful to us": How the tobacco industry attempted to delay and discredit the 1997 Australian National Health and Medical Research Council report on passive smoking
Open Access
- 1 December 2003
- journal article
- review article
- Published by BMJ in Tobacco Control
- Vol. 12 (90003) , 102iii-106
- https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.12.suppl_3.iii102
Abstract
Background: Major reviews of the health effects of passive smoking have been subjected to tobacco industry campaigns to refute the scientific evidence. Following the 1992 US Environmental Protection Agency review, the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) initiated a review of the health effects of passive smoking. At the time of this review, evidence that environmental tobacco smoke causes disease was being increasingly accepted in courts of law and voluntary adoption of smoking restrictions was rapidly growing. Objective: To demonstrate how the tobacco industry attempted to delay and discredit the publication of a report on passive smoking that the tobacco industry anticipated to contain recommendations that would be unfavourable to their business. Methods: A search of tobacco industry documents on the Master Settlement Agreement websites was conducted using the terms and acronyms representative of the NHMRC review. Results: The tobacco industry sought to impede the progress of the NHMRC Working Party by launching an intensive campaign to delay and discredit the report. The main strategies used were attempts to criticise the science, extensive use of Freedom of Information provisions to monitor all activity of the group, legal challenges, ad hominem attacks on the credibility of the Working Party members, rallying support from industry allies, and influencing public opinion through the media. Conclusions: The Australian tobacco industry deliberately impeded the NHMRC Working Party’s progress and successfully prevented the publication of the report’s recommendations. The tobacco industry’s motivation and capacity to disrupt the advancement of scientific knowledge and policy in tobacco control should be recognised and anticipated.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- “Can’t stop the boy”: Philip Morris’ use of Healthy Buildings International to prevent workplace smoking bans in AustraliaTobacco Control, 2003
- Tobacco industry manipulation of the hospitality industry to maintain smoking in public placesTobacco Control, 2002
- Tobacco industry efforts at discrediting scientific knowledge of environmental tobacco smoke: a review of internal industry documentsJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2001
- Tobacco industry efforts subverting International Agency for Research on Cancer's second-hand smoke studyThe Lancet, 2000
- The hot air on passive smokingBMJ, 1998
- Industry-Funded Research and Conflict of Interest: An Analysis of Research Sponsored by the Tobacco Industry Through the Center for Indoor Air ResearchJournal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 1996
- Environmental Tobacco SmokeJAMA, 1995
- Environmental tobacco smoke. The Brown and Williamson documentsPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1995
- Why the Tobacco Industry Fears the Passive Smoking IssueInternational Journal of Health Services, 1990
- Non-smoking wives of heavy smokers have a higher risk of lung cancer: a study from Japan.BMJ, 1981