The Direct-Historical Approach in California Archaeology
- 1 October 1941
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Antiquity
- Vol. 7 (2Part1) , 98-122
- https://doi.org/10.2307/276058
Abstract
The field of California archaeology has long been considered an example of unproductive and timeless culture. This judgment has hardly been a fair one, yet the fault lay not with the anthropological public but rather with the local archaeologists, since field work was rare, intermittent, and unplanned. No scientific institution has ever found it possible or deemed it advisable to institute a long-term archaeological survey of the area. However, the past ten years have seen the recording of sufficient data to demand a retraction of the older viewpoint which offered little promise in future work. In 1929, David Banks Rogers published his volume on the archaeology of the Santa Barbara region; Olson's preliminary report followed a year later. Both treatises are in essential agreement as to the type and succession of prehistoric cultures on the Santa Barbara coast.Keywords
This publication has 2 references indexed in Scilit:
- Archaeological Horizons in Central CaliforniaAmerican Anthropologist, 1939
- Ivory in China. Berthold LauferAmerican Anthropologist, 1926