Effect of Age on Health State Valuations
- 1 January 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Health Services Research & Policy
- Vol. 5 (1) , 17-21
- https://doi.org/10.1177/135581960000500106
Abstract
Valuations for health states defined by the EQ-5D measure of health-related quality of life, which were elicited using the time trade-off method, from a large sample of the UK general population have previously been shown to be related to the age of the respondent. This paper presents population valuation tariffs for all EQ-5D health states for those aged 18–59 and those aged 60 and over. Health state valuations were elicited from a representative sample of over 3000 members of the UK general population using one-to-one interviews. The same regression technique which had previously been used to estimate the EQ-5D tariff for the whole population is used in the current analysis. Additional variables were created which were the product of the original variables and the dummy attached to the age group of the respondent. An earlier qualitative study had suggested that some of the observed differences in valuations might have resulted from more older respondents doubting the plausibility of the ‘worse than dead’ scenario. Therefore, the model was estimated both when the scores of those aged 60 and over were unmodified and when they were modified to account for this possibility. The tariff based on values from those aged 60 and over, was considerably lower than that based on values from those aged 18–59. When changes between health states were calculated, the difference could be as much as 0.15 on a scale between −1 and 1. However, when the scores of older respondents were adjusted, on the assumption that their lower values for states rated as worse than dead were due to an experimental artefact, the differences between the valuation tariffs of the two age groups greatly diminished. These results suggest that whose values are used may have an important effect on health state valuations, and in turn, therefore, on resource allocation decisions, but more research is needed to understand the source of the differences between the values given by different population subgroups.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Valuing health states. Interviews with the general publicEuropean Journal of Public Health, 1997
- Modeling Valuations for EuroQol Health StatesMedical Care, 1997
- Valuing health status using VAS and TTO: What lies behind the numbers?Social Science & Medicine, 1997
- Aggregating Health State ValuationsJournal of Health Services Research & Policy, 1997
- A pragmatic defence of health status measuresHealth Care Analysis, 1996
- EuroQol: the current state of playHealth Policy, 1996
- Valuing health states: A comparison of methodsJournal of Health Economics, 1996
- Statistical Versus Quantitative Significance in the Socioeconomic Evaluation of MedicinesPharmacoEconomics, 1994
- Measuring Preferences for Health States Worse than DeathMedical Decision Making, 1994
- Methodology for measuring health-state preferences—III: Population and context effectsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1989